Jim Martin

Jim Martin has no picture

Guest Posts from trial lawyers and others interested in trial work from around the country.


Articles By This Author

Life Investors of America, Transamerica, Monumental: Class Action: Deadline Upcoming

 

From Attorney Joey James: 

Our firm is currently representing consumers who have cancer insurance policies with Life Investors Insurance Company of America as well as Transamerica, Monumental Life, and Aegeon Insurance.

Good  and honest  people bought cancer policies for a simple reason - To  provide for a reimbursement amount of “actual charges” to be paid when incurred or billed. When claims were submitted, we believe that these two companies do not pay the “actual charges.” Instead, these  insurer  will pay a discounted amount for those same cancer treatments, contrary to the terms of the policy. We are pursuing individual cases.

Many people who bought a cancer insurance policy may have  a received recently a class action notice in the case of  Runyan v. Life Investors Insurance Company of America / Transamerica.  The time period that applies to  any  policy bought during the years 2004 - 2006.

In my view, if an insured does not opt out, but later must fight an onset of cancer, the insurance company will not have to pay you the benefits they promised to pay.  We suggest that everyone immediately opt out of this class action.

YOU MUST OPT OUT BEFORE JUNE 28, 2009.

In our experience,  the class action relief asked for is simply not an adequate remedy.  As we see it,  the Runyan class settlement is inadequate relief for policyholders.

We believe that “opting out” of the class action may be more appropriate to protect their individual rights. Alternatively, filing an objection to the class may be even more appropriate.  We are currently evaluating both of these options for these policyowners, but we are nonetheless accepting cases for those who wish to either opt out or object to the class settlement in its entirety. 

The deadline to exclude yourself from this class is June 29, 2009.  The deadline to object to the settlement is June 29. 2009.

Joey James may be reached at 888.422.2882.

 

<Please note that this is not legal advice. Your circumstances may differ. We suggest you use common sense, and talk with a lawyer>

 

Georgia: First Hydroxycut Lawsuit Filed in State Court

(From Rick Kuykendall)

 

My friends Mark Zamora and Joey James have filed a State Court Hydroxycut lawsuit  against the makers, suppliers, distributors,  and sellers of Hydroxycut. It's not a class action, but an individual lawsuit.

 

My friends are currently the lead lawyers on several cases involving another recalled Over The Counter (OTC) supplement that is known as Total Body Formula. That set of cases is likewise filed in Georgia.

 

Some lawyers may seek class action status regarding Hydroxycut. From  lawyer to lawyer, the primary issue is will a person who claims an injury allegedly caused by Hydryxocut be better served by a class action, or by a singular case. In my opinion, the class action route is not the way to go, but each person's situation is of course unique. 

 

You can find information on Hydroxycut and the lawsuit filed on ageorgilawyer.com .... Mark said to expect it soon.

 

 

 

RV Accidents and Tire Failures

Tire Failures involving RVs:

Consumers have reported that the Goodyear model G159 tire in size 275/70 22.5 fails without warning causing serious RV accidents and RV damage. This popular Goodyear tire was not designed for use on recreational vehicles but was still used on many. As a RV tire, it has a serious design flaw that could potentially cause a catastrophic RV wreck leading to severe injury or even death. The G159 Goodyear tire has a history of de-treads and failures as a RV tire and we urge RV motorists to discontinue use of their G159 tires.

Goodyear and some of the RV manufacturers have initiated limited recalls and tire replacement programs for the G159, but there are thousands of RVs still in use today that are equipped with this defective tire. Fleetwood, Monaco and other RV manufacturers used the defective G159 Goodyear tires on several of their Class A RV models manufactured between the mid 1990’s and 2004. If you drive a RV with Goodyear tires, check to see if your RV is equipped with G159’s. Talk to us if your RV had these tires on it.

Also,

­

Country Coach, one of the nation’s largest manufacturers of Class A motorhomes, has launched multiple recalls to replace the tires on some of its motor homes,blaming the Toyo tire company for outfitting its recreational vehicles with tires unable to carry

their weight.

Country Coach, a Junction City, Oregon-based subsidiary of RV Holdings Inc. has said that
Toyo’s M102z models were responsible for more than 50 tire failures since 2003 ­ (a charge that
Toyo has denied). This most recent safety campaign underscores what appears to be
an industry-wide problem: RV manufacturers under-rating the axle weight of their vehicles and
outfitting them with tires that cannot bear the load, particularly in the left front. In the last several
years, at least five manufacturers, including Fleetwood, Newmar, Airstream, Four Winds and
National RV Inc., have initiated recalls involving more than a dozen motor home models with
incorrect weight or tire pressure ratings.

With government scrutiny increasing, this problem is also pitting tire manufacturers against RV-
makers as both try to lay the responsibility for these accidents on each other. Toyo has
issued a technical bulletin to its dealers sternly advising against outfitting any motor home
manufactured by RV Holdings Inc. with a Toyo tire.

In the meantime, RV owners have borne the brunt of these miscalculations in the form of sudden
sidewall blowouts on the road. The Country Coach tire failures have mostly resulted in property
damage accidents. But in other cases, motor home tire failures have resulted in injuries and
fatalities.

Some of the recreational vehicles most vulnerable to weight and tire issues are Class A Motor
homes, the largest, and usually the most luxuriously appointed RVs on the road. They measure
24-40 feet in length and feature a kitchen, cockpit, living area, a bathroom and a bedroom. Over
the years, manufacturers have found a way to maximize the living space with motorized slide-out
units. Some models have multiple slide outs. But, as other motor home manufacturers have
discovered, slide-out units can also considerable stress on the front tires.

 

 

Attorney Richard Shapiro's Site: Retinopathy of Prematurity

Richard Shapiro is a nationally renowned lawyer who has devoted his life’s work to helping the victims of medical mistakes.  His compassion for those who have been injured, especially children, is nationally known. He obtained justice for a child in excess of $10 million dollars for a blind, quadriplegic girl named Jessica R.

Now, Richard has launched a site that addresses Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) and it implications. ROP is a potentially blinding eye disorder that primarily affects premature infants weighing  approximately three pounds or less, born before 31 weeks of gestation (A full-term pregnancy has a gestation of 38–42 weeks). The smaller a baby is at birth, the more likely that baby will develop ROP. This condition is one of the most common causes of visual loss in childhood and can lead to lifelong vision impairment and blindness.

Go here to check out the site. www.babyblindness.com Continue Reading...

Trucking Interrogatories

  • Brian Parker - a young lawyer working in Mark Zamora's law offices in Atlanta submits these Trucking Interrogatories:


INTERROGATORIES


GENERAL

  1. What is Defendant’s document retention policy?

WRECK

  1. Was driver within course and scope of his employment at the time of the collision?

  2. If anyone on behalf of Defendant went to the collision scene please answer the following:

    1. Who on behalf of Defendant photographed or video graphed the scene, vehicles or both?

    2. Who on behalf of Defendant measured the collision scene?

  3. Who on behalf of Defendant interviewed potential witnesses?

  4. Who on behalf of Defendant investigated the wreck?

  5. Who on behalf of Defendant reconstructed the wreck?

  6. Who on behalf of Defendant took possession of the vehicle contents?

  7. What was the destination of the driver at the time of wreck? Please include in this answer: the delivery time of the load on the accident vehicle and if the delivery of load was time sensitive please explain.

  8. Was accident report made to USDOT? If so, who made it and when?

  9. Was there a written contract with the company that the load was going to? If so please state:

  10. Please list physical evidence removed from scene/vehicles/driver/personal possessions and state who has those possessions now.

PEOPLE

  1. Please provide the name and title of officer, agent, servant or employee of Defendant most knowledgeable about and responsible foreach of the following:

    1. Discovery responses;

    2. Document retention;

    3. Personnel/driver qualification files;

    4. Driver training;

    5. Loss prevention & risk management;

    6. Dispatching;

    7. Compliance with FMCSR;

    8. Fleet maintenance;

    9. Accident/wreck investigations;

    10. Driver discipline/termination;

    11. Driver log acquisition and verification;

    12. Driver hours of service verification;

  2. Please provide the name, address and telephone number of drivers who now live in Georgia.

  3. Please provide the name, address and telephone number of drivers who have been terminated within last 5 years.


DEFENDANT’S VEHICLE INVOLVED IN WRECK

  1. What was the weight of the tractor and trailer combination at time of wreck?

  2. What was the weight of the load on the trailer combination at time of wreck?

  3. Did the tractor/trailer have black box (ECM/DDEC/Etc)? Please provide details.

  4. Did the tractor trailer have satellite tracking/communications system (Qualcom) onboard? Please provide details.

  5. Had the tractor trailer combination been previously wrecked?

  6. Please provide information regarding the last maintenance on vehicle; what was performed, where it was performed, and when.


DEFENDANT’S DRIVER INVOLVED IN WRECK

  1. Please provide the name, address, age, date of birth, and social security number of the driver.

  2. What is the driver’s employment history with the company?

  3. Did he/she attend driver school? If so, when and where?

  4. Please list driver’s traffic violations last 5 years.

  5. Please list driver’s discipline record with Defendant.

  6. Please provide driver’s past employment history.

  7. Please provide the date, time, origin and destination of driver loads forthe last 5 years.

  8. Did the driver keep logs and vehicle inspections? Who has these now?

  9. Please provide the name, title and location of the manager/dispatcher responsible for the driver involved in the wreck

  10. Did the driver have any loans (school or otherwise) with Defendant at the time of the wreck? Please provide the terms of the loan.

  11. Was the Defendant driver involved in this wreck administered an alcohol/drug test subsequent to the wreck? If so, please state by whom, where, when and the results.

  12. How was the driver paid (mile/hourly/salary) and what was his pay?

(company name)

  1. State whether Defendant is engaged in any types of business other than the principal business referred to in the preceding interrogatory and identify each and every business entity which is in any way legally related to Defendant or to any affiliate, parent, or subsidiary of Defendant. Please state the nature of each such business, and state with particularity whether such business is conducted by Defendant or by any affiliate, parent, or subsidiary of Defendant. State also the periods of time during which each such business has been engaged in by Defendant or by such affiliate, parent, or subsidiary of Defendant.

  2. What is the number of tractors/trailers in fleet?

  3. How many drivers are employed by the company?

  4. How are logs audited (manually or electronic) and how many log auditors are employed by the company?

  5. What computer software systems are used for payroll, maintenance, driver qualifications, and compliance with FMCSR?

  6. What is the company policy on driver discipline for violation of FMCSR?

  7. What is the frequency and content of safety meetings?

  8. What are the minimum qualifications for drivers?

  9. Does Defendant own/interest in driving school? If so, please explain.

  10. What is the written policy on fleet repair and maintenance? Please provide the name of someone who has a copy.

  11. What is the written policy on internal investigation and review of a wreck? Please provide the name of someone who has a copy.

  12. What is the reportable accident note and safety rating of defendant as given/assigned by the FMCSA for last 10 years?

  13. Has Defendant ever received an unsatisfactory safety rating by FMCSA? If so, when and why?

  14. How much was budgeted in each of the last 5 years for fleet maintenance, safety training, advertisement for drivers, and driver training?

OTHER SIMILAR CASES/CLAIMS

  1. Please provide the name, address, and telephone number of personal injury claimant for personal injury where no suit was brought against Defendant within last 5 years. What was the outcome of each?

  2. Please provide the name and address of all plaintiffs and plaintiff’s attorneys in personal injury suits brought against Defendant within the last 5 years, including the Caption (state, court and case number) of each case.

  3. Please provide the name and address of the log auditor(s) and dispatcher(s) on day of wreck

  4. Please provide the names, addresses, and titles of all log auditors and dispatchers employed by Defendant within last 5 years.




Respectfully submitted this ____ day of _____ 2007.




______________________

Brian S. Parker

Georgia Bar No. 142228

Attorneys for Plaintiff











Tags:

Attitude is Everything

Another guest post from Howard Spiva of the Spiva Law Group. Howard is currently the President of the Southern Trial Lawyer's Assocation and a very talented and successful trial lawyer from Savannah, Georgia.

My favorite way of "adjusting" my own attitude is to refer to quotes. Often times who said the quote is as important as what is said. One of my favorite is by Christopher Reeves, who said, you can stay in the shallow end of the pool or choose to go out into the ocean. Below I have assembled some other examples.

A few years back, a dear friend of mine and I started assembling 1000s of quotes. We narrowed them down to 100s. We then ran a daily quote in the Savannah newspaper. Many people cut the quotes out and collected them.

This man was Kerry Randall. Kerry really touched my life. Kerry is no longer with us and I miss him dearly. Together Kerry and I also made up some quotes of our own. I invite you to read these quotes, share them, repeat them and please feel free to add to the list.

Attitude is everything! - Quotes Assembled by Howard E. Spiva

Don't wait. The time will never be just right.
- Napoleon Hill

You can stay in the shallow end of the pool, or choose to go out into the ocean.
-Christopher Reeves

Don't let the start stop you from being successful. It's often the start that stops people.
- Howard Spiva Continue Reading...

Have Justice Will Travel - The War Wagon

This is a guest post from Howard Spiva of the Spiva Law Group. Howard is currently the President of the Southern Trial Lawyer's Assocation and a very talented and successful trial lawyer from Savannah, Georgia.

A lawsuit, and the trial of a case, is a lot like a battle. The resources, experience, and strength of the attorneys are crucial. The outcome of a lawsuit over a catastrophic or serious injury will affect the rest of the client's life. Often, it's the little things that make big differences.

At my firm,  The War Wagon is one of the many "little things" we use in our "lawsuit battles." The War Wagon is a custom-outfitted, 40-foot motor home. Our War Wagon is always parked just a few minutes walk away from the courtroom. This provides our clients and witnesses comfort and convenience that can give us the edge over opposition, stuck sitting in the courtroom all day, or shuttling back and forth between hotel rooms and the courthouse.

The War Wagon gives us fourteen important advantages, strategic advantages that frequently make huge differences during trial.

Never get caught with your pants down!
The War Wagon is a great place for attorneys and clients to have a private lunch and discuss their case without the risk of being seen or heard by a juror or witness. Countless times, jurors see or hear things in restaurants, unbeknownst to clients or witnesses, that have made or lost trials.

When you look like a winner, you are a winner.
In a long trial, in many older courtrooms with inadequate air conditioning, we use the War Wagon to take a quick shower and change into a fresh shirt during the afternoon recess. When we walk back into a hot and sweaty courtroom, we look fresh and alive. While opposing council looks exhausted and bedraggled, we look like winners.

Continue Reading...

Lobbyists at the FDA

Over the past 10 years, more and more innovative and expensive drugs have been pushed to market on what's called the "fast track" at the Federal Drug Administration.  What does the fast track achieve?  It allows big pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, Merck, Bayer, Wyeth, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Hoffman-LaRoche, AstraZeneca, etc. to rush lightly tested and sometimes barely proven drugs to the general public.  Why is this important?  Because people are getting hurt, and even killed by these drugs that are rushed to market before they are proven safe or before sterner "Black Box" warnings can be put on the labels, and in some instances, before their efficacy is proven.

Continue Reading...

Meso: A Primer

As far back as the early 1900's, corporations knew of the dangers associated with exposure to asbestos containing products. Yet every year, including this year, as many as 3,000 people are diagnosed with
asbestos-related cancer.

The reason is that corporations, with full knowledge of the dangers made a deliberate decision to expose employees to asbestos containing products and those workers today are paying the ultimate price with their life. If you worked as a pipe fitter, steam fitter, changed brake pads, broiler maker, in construction or demolition trade chances are pretty good that you were exposed to asbestos.


Continue Reading...

How to Convert from Paper to Electronic Files: Start With a Policy

Is this you? You have been scanning legal documents for years. You scan pleadings, contracts and other documents and convert them to PDF or TIFF images, then email them to clients and other lawyers. Even some courts require filing documents electronically instead of in paper. You have been thinking about getting a faster scanner and converting all your paper files to electronic files. You see this as an answer to the continually-growing room of closed files or the large monthly bill for offsite closed file storage. If this is you, now is the time to write an electronic file policy.

Electronic files are ethical. The Florida Bar Professional Ethics Committee recently issued Opinion 06-1 which expressly states that lawyers may store files electronically. There are a few exceptions, such as the need to keep originals required for evidence, the need to keep originals belonging to clients, the need to keep originals to comply with a statute or rule (6 years for trust account checks), and the need to keep a paper document when destroying it would adversely affect the client?s interests. The opinion states:

Lawyers may, but are not required to, store files electronically unless: a statute or rule requires retention of an original document, the original document is the property of the client, or destruction of a paper document adversely affects the client?s interests. Files stored electronically must be readily reproducible and protected from inadvertent modification, degradation or destruction.

The file belongs to the lawyer. The ethics opinion makes sense because files relating to client matters are assets of the lawyer and do not belong to present and former clients. "Files prepared and maintained by an attorney for the purpose of representing a client are the attorney's personal property." Potts v. State, 869 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2004), citing Long v. Dillinger, 701 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 1997. The Florida Supreme Court in Long stated:

As noted by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Dowda & Fields, P.A. v. Cobb, 452 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), files prepared and maintained by attorneys on their clients' cases are commonly referenced by a particular client's name. In reality, however, such referral simply means that the file relates to a particular client; the file and its contents are the personal property of the attorney. Id. at 1142. The court reached this conclusion based on the fact that the attorney's file may or may not contain documents or other property of the client. Importantly, the court noted that, while the attorney may have an ethical duty to communicate information to successor counsel, only actual property of the client must be returned.

The federal court provides a good starting point. Much of the work in drafting an electronic file policy for lawyers has already been done by the federal courts in adopting procedures for electronic filing. The procedures provide sound wording to make it clear that the court file is the electronic file that resides on the court's computer server and not the paper document that was the source of the electronic file. Therefore, a starting point for drafting an electronic file policy for a lawyer or law firm should be to review the electronic filing policy of the local federal court. For example, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida adopted the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal Cases, which states:

1. A. Effective Date: Unless otherwise permitted by these administrative procedures, by a general order of the Court, or by authorization of the Judge, all documents filed in Civil and Criminal cases in this District on or after July 12, 2004, no matter when a case was originally filed, shall be filed electronically.

B. Official Record: The official court record is the electronic file maintained on the Court's server and any physical item or document permitted to be filed in paper format. When a document filed in paper format is scanned and uploaded to the Court's server, the electronic file shall constitute the official record.

Here is a sample electronic file policy. Set forth below is a sample electronic file policy for a sole practitioner or small law firm in Florida. It is only a beginning, though, because the policy should include the specifics applicable to that lawyer or firm.

Electronic File Policy

[Lawyer]

[Date]

1. Electronic Files
All files that we maintain regarding clients and their matters are stored electronically on our computer file server. All incoming and outgoing paper documents are scanned daily and added to these electronic files. After scanning, the paper documents are placed into paper file folders in chronological order for convenience, but the electronic file is this office's actual file relating to that client and that client's matter. The paper file folders are shredded from time to time (see below), but the electronic files are maintained after the paper file folders and contents are shredded.

2. Scanning
Each day all incoming and outgoing paper documents are placed by the lawyer into the sorting box in the order to be filed for that day (basically chronological). At the end of each day, the paper documents are scanned and uploaded to the office server into an electronic file designated as the general file relating to that client and the paper document is then filed in a paper file folder labeled with the client?s name and the designation "general file". Once the paper document is scanned and uploaded to the office server, the electronic file shall become part of the office file. The paper file is merely for the lawyer?s convenience while the case is open. Any original paper documents are copied and scanned to the electronic file and returned to the client or other person who gave them or filed with the court (see below).

3. File Backups
All electronic files that we maintain regarding clients and their matters are backed up daily by synchronizing the entire server to an external hard drive, which is then taken off site. There are seven external hard drives that are backed up in rotation and kept off site as follows:

Daily A and Daily B [specify offsite location]
Weekly A and Weekly B [specify offsite location]
Monthly A and Monthly B [specify offsite location]
Annual [specify offsite location]

In addition, whenever paper file folders are shredded, the electronic files are copied to three CDs and kept onsite and offsite at [specify locations] and are also copied to a remote online storage server by SSL-secured Internet transmission.

4. File Ownership

All files that we maintain regarding clients and their matters belong to this office and not to the client. This includes both the electronic files and paper file folders. As noted by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Dowda & Fields, P.A. v. Cobb, 452 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984): "[F]iles prepared and maintained by attorneys on their clients' cases are commonly referenced by a particular client's name. In reality, however, such referral simply means that the file relates to a particular client; the file and its contents are the personal property of the attorney. Id. at 1142. The court reached this conclusion based on the fact that the attorney's file may or may not contain documents or other property of the client. Importantly, the court noted that, while the attorney may have an ethical duty to communicate information to successor counsel, only actual property of the client must be returned."

5. Document Originals
Our policy is that we do not keep original documents that belong to clients or others. If a client provides us an original document, we scan it to our electronic file and make a copy for our paper file folder and return the original to the client. Therefore, the contents of our files regarding clients and their matters do not contain any original documents belonging to the client. The only exceptions to this are as follows:
i. Original will of a decedent, which we file immediately with the Clerk.
ii. Evidence for lawsuits, which is filed with the Court or returned to the client at the conclusion of the case.

6. Client Copies

Our policy is to keep our clients informed by providing them copies of documents that we receive and that we send regarding their matter at the time they are received or sent. It is the responsibility of the client to maintain their copies of documents for their own files.

7. Shredding Paper Files

Paper file shredding is performed at the lawyer's direction by an outside service provider in such a manner that the provider cannot view contents of files. Shredding is observed by the lawyer or legal assistant. Paper file folders can be shredded at any time upon the lawyer's direction as long as they have been scanned and uploaded to the officer server because the electronic files are the office's files regarding clients and matters. When a paper document is scanned and uploaded to the electronic file on the office server, the paper document will be filed in the paper file folder, which can be shredded upon the lawyer's direction (see exception above for original documents). Continue Reading...

Older Entries

September 20, 2006 — Richard Jones on Trying Inadequate Security Cases

September 20, 2006 — The Case on a Single Page