Randy Scarlett

Randy Scarlett has no picture

Randall H. Scarlett, principal of San Francisco based Scarlett Law Group, concentrates his practice in the areas of catastrophic personal injury, brain injury, medical malpractice, wrongful death, environmental and complex consumer actions. Mr. Scarlett is recognized internationally as an expert in the area of Neurolaw and the trial of cases involving traumatic brain injury. The Scarlett Law Group follows the ideal that a small, highly dedicated group of bright, motivated people can make a difference, no matter what the challenge. The firm is committed to making a difference for its clients and community.The Scarlett Law Group concentrates its practice on the vigorous and ethical representation of catastrophically injured clients as well as their survivors. The firm continues to focus on the representation of those sustaining traumatic brain injury.The firm builds on the courtroom victories of Mr. Scarlett, one client at a time. Recognizing that there is no greater accomplishment then improving the quality of his client's lives, Mr. Scarlett's dynamic courtroom style has served his clients well and his verdicts speak loudly of his dedication to clients.In 1990, Mr. Scarlett recovered $2.3 million for a client who suffered a speech disorder following an errant surgery-one of the highest medical malpractice verdicts in Central Valley of California.In 1994, as lead counsel for the direct action plaintiffs against Ferdinand Marcos, a Honolulu jury awarded his clients millions of dollars in compensatory damages as well as $1.2 billion in exemplary damages.In 1995, an Alameda County jury awarded Mr. Scarlett's 7-year-old brain injured client more than $26 million after her doctor failed to diagnose H-Flu meningitis.Presently, he represents 750 clients impacted by the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Mr. Scarlett was appointed by the District Court judge as one of the qualified counsel in the case for the mandatory punitive damage class, for whom a $5 billion verdict was obtained.Mr. Scarlett's dedication to those sustaining traumatic brain injury has been tireless. In fact, he obtained verdicts and/or settlements on behalf of survivors with brain injury in excess of $1 million in both California and Nevada. Mr. Scarlett was recently nominated by the San Francisco Trial Lawyers as Trial Lawyer of the Year as a result of a 2005 Placer County verdict in which he obtained $1.2 million for a victim of an automobile collision.Licensed to practice law in California and Wash, D.C., Mr. Scarlett uses cutting edge demonstrative evidence to prove his client's cases. He serves on the Board of Directors of the California Brain Injury Association, as well as the Marin Brain Injury Network. He is a Fellow, National College of Advocacy; Past-President, Belli Society; Past-Chair, ATLA's Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group and has received Martindale-Hubbell's highest AV rating. He is also listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.


Articles By This Author

Litigating Spinal Cord and Brain Injury pt. 5

LOSS OF CONSORTIUM

Loss of consortium is finally recognized in most jurisdictions. In lay terms, loss of consortium or “trauma to the marital relationship” recognizes the fact that due to injury, a spouse may not be capable of performing those tasks as pre-morbidly performed.

Continue Reading...

Litigating Spinal Cord and Brain Injury pt. 4

LIFE CARE PLAN

     Spinal cord injury cases necessitate the retention of a life care planner. This specialist is taxed with the obligation to coordinate with all of the plaintiff’s treating physicians in order a clear medically probable future care plan is developed.

Continue Reading...

Litigating Spinal Cord and Brain Injury pt. 3

WAGE LOSS/LOSS OF EARNING CAPACITY

Special damages are more important today than ever before. In spinal cord injury cases, your clients will have significant demonstrative losses. DO NOT OVERREACH. If your client can possibly work, explore all options with an appropriate vocational rehabilitation specialist. Present several alternative options, leaving the jury with the option.

Continue Reading...

Litigating Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Cases pt. 2

EVALUATING INJURY

A young lawyer today is far more likely to encounter a case involving paraplegia or quadriplegia than an experienced lawyer of twenty years ago. Clearly, victims of spinal cord injury benefit from recent medical advances in treatment, particularly rehabilitative treatment. Rehabilitation centers throughout the United States can assist (certainly more than twenty years ago) in getting the plaintiff back to a productive, albeit limited, lifestyle.

Continue Reading...

Litigating Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Cases pt. 1

Let’s face it, cases involving spinal cord injury are major commitments requiring a significant investment both of attorney time and resource. A spinal cord injury is a catastrophic event, impacting upon the life of the survivor as well as his/her family. Damages in any catastrophic case are extensive, and this is no less true in a case involving spinal cord injury. Yet, speak to any seasoned trial lawyer, and you will learn that the problems associated with trial of a spinal cord injury case can be numerous, and potentially life threatening to the plaintiff.

Continue Reading...

Sample Post for Randy Scarlett

Sample Post so that Randy's bio will show.

Older Entries